The Online Books Page

Flutter (Aerodynamics) -- Tesing

See also what's at your library, or elsewhere.

• Flutter (Aerodynamics)

• Panel flutter studies of boost-vehicle full-scale flight insulation panels (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1967), by Michael L. Nacht, Richard L. Greene, and Lewis Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)

Items below (if any) are from related and broader terms.

• The flutter of aeroplane wings. (H. M. Stationery Off., 1929), by R. A. Frazer (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Propeller blade stall flutter investigation. Contract no. AF 33(616)-2670. (Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc., 1958), by William Gordon Brady (page images at HathiTrust)
• Investigation of helicopter rotor blade flutter and flapwise bending response in hovering (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 1959., 1959), by Frank A. DuWaldt, R. A. Piziali, C. A. Gates, Wright Air Development Center, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. Air Force. Air Research and Development Command (page images at HathiTrust)
• Determination of the performance parameters of a fluttering vane-type fuze-arming device using a controlled-geometry wind tunnel (Naval Ordnance Laboratory, 1970), by Frank P. Baltakis, Paul J. Dawson, and Gary D. Senechal (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-2051 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963), by E. Carson Yates, Samuel R. Bland, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Control surface spanwise placement in active flutter suppression systems (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1988), by E. Nissim, John J. Burken, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• On curve veering and flutter of rotating blades (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1993), by Dare Afolabi and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter analysis using transversality theory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1993), by D. Afolabi and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Planform curvature effects on flutter characteristics of a wing with 56 ̊leading-edge sweep and panel aspect ratio of 1.14 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program ;, 1991), by Donald F. Keller, Theresa L. Pinkerton, M. C. Sandford, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Span reduction effects on flutter characteristics of arrow-wing supersonic transport configurations (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1991), by Donald F. Keller, Ellen Parker Bullock, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Design of control laws for flutter suppression based on the aerodynamic energy concept and comparisons with other design methods (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1990), by E. Nissim and Dryden Flight Research Facility (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some effects of variations in density and aerodynamic parameters on the calculated flutter characteristics of finite-span swept and unswept wings at subsonic and supersonic speeds (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1960), by E. Carson Yates and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Use of experimental steady-flow aerodynamic parameters in the calculation of flutter characteristics for finite-span swept or unswept wings at subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speed (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1960), by E. Carson Yates and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Interstage adapter panel flutter on Atlas-Centaur AC-2, AC-3, and AC-4 vehicles (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1965), by Tilak R. Lall and Lewis Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and analytical transonic flutter characteristics of a geared-elevator configuration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office ;, 1980), by Charles L. Ruhlin, Richard A. Gregory, Robert V. Doggett, Langley Research Center, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Office (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter analysis of an airplane with multiple structural nonlinearities in the control system (U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1980), by Elmar J. Breitbach, United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Modal interaction in linear dynamic systems near degenerate modes (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1991), by D. Afolabi and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Generalization of the subsonic kernel function in the s-Plane, with applications to flutter analysis (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1984), by Herbert J. Cunningham, Robert N. Desmarais, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch (page images at HathiTrust)
• Formulation of blade-flutter spectral analyses in stationary reference frame (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1984), by Anatole P. Kurkov and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch (page images at HathiTrust)
• Effects of winglet on transonic flutter characteristics of a cantilevered twin-engine-transport wing model (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1986), by Charles L. Ruhlin, K. S. Nagaraja, Kumar G. Bhatia, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Passive control of wing/store flutter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1980), by Wilmer H. Reed, Jerome T. Foughner, F. W. Cazier, Langley Research Center, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch (page images at HathiTrust)
• Comparison of analytical predictions of longitudinal short-period pilot-induced oscillations with results from a simulation study of the space shuttle orbiter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1982), by Donald R. Riley, G. Kimball Miller, United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and analytical investigation of the effect of spanwise curvature on wing flutter at Mach number of 0.7 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1989), by Jose A. Rivera (page images at HathiTrust)
• Analysis of an unswept propfan blade with a semiempirical dynamic stall model (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1989), by T. S. R. Reddy and K. R. V. Kaza (page images at HathiTrust)
• Application of Zimmerman flutter-margin criterion to a wind-tunnel model (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1982), by Robert M. Bennett and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch (page images at HathiTrust)
• Analysis of supersonic stall bending flutter in axial-flow compressor by actuator disk theory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office ;, 1978), by John J. Adamczyk, United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Office, and Lewis Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Development and application of an optimization procedure for flutter supression using the aerodynamic energy concept (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office ;, 1978), by E. Nissim, Irving Abel, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Office (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter clearance of the F-18 high-angle-of-attack research vehicle with experimental wingtip instrumentation pods (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1989), by Lawrence C. Freudinger and Dryden Flight Research Facility (page images at HathiTrust)
• An experimental study of tip shape effects on the flutter of aft-swept, flat-plate wings (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1990), by Bryan E. Dansberry, Moses G. Farmer, Jose A. Rivera, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• An experimental and analytical investigation of proprotor whirl flutter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office ;, 1977), by Raymond G. Kvaternik, Jerome S. Kohn, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Office (page images at HathiTrust)
• Preliminary study of effects of winglets on wing flutter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1976), by Robert V. Doggett, Moses G. Farmer, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter of a low-aspect-ratio rectangular wing (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division ;, 1989), by Stanley R. Cole and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Aeroelastic modal characteristics of mistuned blade assemblies : mode localization and loss of Eigenstructure (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1991), by Christophe Pierre, Durbha V. Murthy, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Application of model control to wing-flutter suppression (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1982), by Aaron J. Ostroff, Samuel Pines, Langley Research Center, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch (page images at HathiTrust)
• Research on panel flutter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1964), by D. R. Kobett (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Study of the pressure distribution on oscillating panels in low supersonic flow with turbulent boundary layer (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1967), by E. F. E. Zeydel, Ames Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Study of flutter related computational procedures for minimum weight structural sizing of advanced aircraft (U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1976), by Robert F. O'Connell, N. A. Radovcich, H. J. Hassig, Lockheed-California Company, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• The flutter of towed rigid decelerators (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1967), by Richard H. MacNeal (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Flutter analysis and testing of pairs of aerodynamically interfering delta wings (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1973), by Richard R. Chipman, Frank J. Rauch, Langley Research Center, and Grumman Aerospace Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA CR-1577 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1970), by Vincent James Piarulli, Richard P. White, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, and Rochester Applied Sciences Associates (page images at HathiTrust)
• Development and applications of supersonic unsteady consistent aerodynamics for interfering parallel wings (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1973), by Kari Appa, G. C. C. Smith, Langley Research Center, and Bell Aerospace Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• A harmonic analysis method for unsteady transonic flow and its application to the flutter of airfoils (National Aeronautical and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1982), by F. Edward Ehlers, W. H. Weatherill, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental investigation of orthotropic panel flutter at arbitrary yaw angles, and comparison with theory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1973), by Peter Shyprykevich, Langley Research Center, and Grumman Aerospace Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• Eigenspace techniques for active flutter suppression (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office ;, 1987), by William L. Garrard, Jerome A. Farm, and Bradley S. Liebst (page images at HathiTrust)
• Determination of subcritical frequency and damping from B-1 flight flutter test data (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch ;, 1979), by Steven Kent Dobbs, C. H. Hodson, Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center, and Rockwell International. Los Angeles Aircraft Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Development and demonstration of a flutter-suppression system using active controls (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1975), by M. C. Sandford, David L. Gray, Irving Abel, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-2038 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1963), by Perry W. Hanson, Gilbert M. Levey, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TR R-330 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1970), by R. W. Hess, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Supersonic flutter of panels loaded with inplane shear (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1975), by James Wayne Sawyer and Langely Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-2360 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1964), by Robert C. Goetz, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-2227 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963), by D. R. Kobett, E. F. E. Zeydel, Mo.) Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-3551 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1966), by Peter A. Gaspers, Bass Redd, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-4357 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1968), by Robert W. Fralich, John A. McElman, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Effect of aerodynamic heating on the flutter of a rectangular wing at a mach number of 2 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1960), by Harry L. Runyan, Nan H. Jones, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental investigation of the influence of the turbulent boundary layer on the pressure distribution over a rigid two-dimensional wavy wall (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1971), by Lado Muhlstein, Richard G. Beranek, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, and Ames Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter Research on skin panels (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1960), by Eldon E. Kordes, Lawrence D. Guy, W. J. Tuovila, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental parametric studies of transonic T-tail flutter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1975), by Charles L. Ruhlin, M. C. Sandford, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter suppression using active controls based on the concept of aerodynamic energy (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1971), by E. Nissim, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-6106 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1971), by Robert Miserentino, Sidney C. Dixon, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-6003 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1970), by Moses G. Farmer, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Application of a supersonic kernel-function procedure to flutter analysis of thin lifting surfaces (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1970), by Herbert J. Cunningham, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Development of a transfer function method for dynamic stability measurement (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1977), by Wayne Johnson and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-5986 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1970), by Walter L. Heard, Herman L. Bohon, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-5759 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1970), by Sidney C. Dixon, M. Latrelle Hudson, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Application of the aerodynamic energy concept to flutter suppression and gust alleviation by use of active controls (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1976), by E. Nissim, A. Caspi, I. Lottati, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Wind-tunnel study of deflected-elevator flutter encountered on a T-Tail airplane (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1969), by Maynard C. Sandford, Charles L. Ruhlin, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Recent advances in aerodynamic energy concept for flutter suppression and gust alleviation using active controls. (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1977), by E. Nissim, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-5555 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ; [For sale for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Virginia 22151], 1969), by Herman L. Bohon, Walter L. Heard, Melvin S. Anderson, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• An experimental investigation of the velocity fluctuations behind oscillating vanes (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1970), by Donald A. Buell, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Ames Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-5508 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ; [For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Virginia 22151], 1969), by Charles P. Shore, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-5419 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1969), by Alfredo Navarro Crespo, Herbert J. Cunningham, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Hypersonic and transonic buzz measurements on the lower pitch flap of M2-F2 lifting entry configuration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1972), by Robert W. Warner, Phillip R. Wilcox, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Ames Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic single-mode flutter and buffet of a low aspect ratio wing having a subsonic airfoil shape (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1974), by Larry L. Erickson, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Ames Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimenmtal flutter results for corrugation-stiffened and unstiffened panels (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1966), by Deene J. Weidman and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic and supersonic flutter trend investigation of a variable-sweep wing (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1961), by John C. Stonesifer, Robert C. Goetz, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-6733 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1972), by L. Keith Barker, Gene W. Sparrow, Daniel J. Crawford, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Automated procedure for design of wing structures to satisfy strength and flutter requirements (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1973), by Raphael T. Haftka and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Thermoelastic damping and its effect on flutter of stressed panels situated in a supersonic airflow (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1971), by R. C. Shieh, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Automated preliminary design of simplified wing structures to satisfy strength and flutter requirements (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1971), by W. Jefferson Stroud, Manuel Stein, Cornelia B. Dexter, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-6427 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1971), by Larry L. Erickson, Ames Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-1807 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963), by Samuel R. Bland, Robert M. Bennett, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Flutter of corrugation-stiffened panels at Mach 3 and comparison with theory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1968), by Herman L. Bohon (page images at HathiTrust)
• NASA TN D-3501 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration :, 1966), by M. C. Sandford, Irving Abel, Charles L. Ruhlin, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-1600 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963), by John G. Presnell, R. L. McKinney, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-1615 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963), by Robert W. Fralich, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• NASA TN D-5222 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1969), by Richard M. Beam, Ames Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some effects of control profile and control trailing-edge angle on the oscillating hinge-moment and flutter characteristics of flap-type controls at transonic speeds (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1960), by William C. Moseley, Thomas G. Gainer, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic flutter study of a 50.5 ̊cropped-delta wing with two rearward-mounted nacelles (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1974), by M. C. Sandford, Irving Abel, Charles L. Ruhlin, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some effects of tip fins of wing flutter characteristics (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ;, 1974), by Robert C. Goetz, Robert V. Doggett, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• NACA wartime reports (Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, 1944), by William H. Phillips, United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and Langley Aeronautical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Analytical study of shimmy of airplane wheels (NACA, 1952), by Christian Bourcier de Carbon and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic flutter investigation of models of proposed horizontal tails for the X-15 airplane (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1961), by Lou S. Young and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic flutter investigation of models of the X-15 airplane horizontal tail (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1961), by Lou S. Young, Samuel R. Bland, and Langley Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Description and analysis of a rocket-vehicle experiment on flutter involving wing deformation and body motions (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1950), by H. J. Cunningham, R. R. Lundstrom, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Results of two free-fall experiments on flutter of thin unswept wings in the transonic speed range (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by WIlliam T. Lauten, Herbert C. Nelson, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and analytical investigation of flutter of a nonuniform sweptback cantilever wing with two concentrated weights (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by John L. Sewall, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Summary of flutter experiences as a guide to the preliminary design of lifting surfaces on missiles (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by Dennis J. Martin, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter investigation of two thin, low-aspect-ratio, swept, solid, metal wings in the transonic range by use of free-falling body (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by W. T. Lauten, Maurice A. Sylvester, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• A preliminary wind-tunnel investigation of flutter characteristics of delta wings (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by Robert W. Herr, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Preliminary study of some factors which affect the stall-flutter characteristics of thin wings (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by A. Gerald Rainey, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Results of two experiments on flutter of high-aspect-ratio swept wings in the transonic speed range (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by William T. Lauten, Burke R. O'Kelly, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter of a 60° delta wing (NACA 65A003 airfoil) encountered at supersonic speeds during the flight test of a rocket-propelled model (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by Joseph H. Judd, William T. Lauten, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and Langley Aeronautical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some experimental studies of panel flutter at Mach number 1.3 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1952), by Maurice A. Sylvester, John E. Baker, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Moment of inertia and damping of fluid in tanks undergoing pitching oscillations (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953), by Edward Widmayer, James R. Reese, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Discussion of three-dimensional oscillating air forces based on wind-tunnel measurements (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953), by Sherman A. Clevenson, W. J. Tuovila, Sumner A. Leadbetter, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Investigation of wing flutter at transonic speeds for six systematically varied wing plan forms (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953), by George W. Jones, Hugh C. DuBose, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some flutter experiments at a Mach number of 1.3 on cantilever wings with a tubular and closed bodes at the tips (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953), by John Locke McCarty, W. J. Tuovila, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• A compilation of experimental flutter information (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1954), by H. J. Cunningham, Brown Harvey H., Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• A wind-tunnel investigation of the first-order vibratory stresses on a full-scale supersonic-type propeller operating in an asymmetric air flow (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1954), by Atwood R. Heath, Robert L. O'Neal, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Supersonic flutter of a 60° delta wing encountered during the flight test of a rocket-propelled model (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1954), by William T. Lauten, Joseph H. Judd, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter investigation of a true-speed dynamic model with various tip-tank configurations (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1955), by John L. Sewall, William B. Igoe, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and theoretical studies of panel flutter at Mach number 1.2 to 3.0 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1955), by Maurice A. Sylvester, Herbert J. Cunningham, Herbert C. Nelson, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter characteristics of swept wings at transonic speeds (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1955), by Laurence K. Loftin, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Exploratory investigation of the moments on oscillating control surfaces at transonic speeds (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1955), by Dennis J. Martin, C. William Martz, Robert F. Thompson, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter investigation at low speed of a 40 degree sweptback wing with pylon-mounted stores, tested as a semispan-cantilever wing and as a full-span wing on a towed airplane model (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1956), by Albert P. Martina, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Investigation of transonic flutter characteristics of a thin 10 degree sweptback wing having an aspect ratio of 4 and a taper ratio of 0.6 (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1957), by George W. Jones, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• An experimental investigation of the effects of Mach number, stabilizer dihedral, and fin torsional stiffness on the transonic flutter characteristics of a tee-tail (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1957), by Norman S. Land, Annie G. Fox, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, and United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter at very high speeds (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1957), by Harry L. Runyan, Homer G. Morgan, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic flutter investigation of two 50° semispan modified-delta wings with tip ailerons (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1958), by Robert J. Platt, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and Langley Aeronautical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental determination of the effects of frequency and amplitude of oscillation on the roll-stability derivatives for a 60° delta-wing airplane model (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1958), by Lewis R. Fisher, United States. National Adviosry Committee for Aeronautics, and Langley Aeronautical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Effect of centrifugal force on flutter of uniform cantilever beam at subsonic speeds with application to compressor and turbine blades (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1949), by Alexander Mendelson and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Appraisal of method of flutter analysis based on chosen modes by comparison with experiment for cases of large mass coupling (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1949), by Donald S. Woolston, Harry L. Runyan, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Some effects of density and Mach number on the flutter speed of two uniform wings (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1949), by George E. Castile, Robert W. Herr, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transient aerodynamic behavior of an airfoil due to different arbitrary modes of nonstationary motions in a supersonic flow (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by Chieh-Chien Chang and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• An Iterative transformation procedure for numerical solution of flutter and similar characteristic-value problems (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by Myron L. Gossard and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Single-degree-of-freedom-flutter calculations for a wing in subsonic potential flow and comparison with an experiment (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by Harry L. Runyan and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Considerations on the effect of wind-tunnel walls on oscillating air forces for two-dimensional subsonic compressible flow (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951), by Harry L. Runyan, Charles E. Watkins, and United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transonic flutter characteristics of a 45° sweptback wing with various distributions of ballast along the leading edge (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1959), by John R. Unangst and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Effect of wing thickness and sweep on the oscillating hinge-moment and flutter characteristics of a flap-type control at transonic speeds (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1959), by William C. Moseley, Thomas G. Gainer, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• An experimental study of the flutter of sails having a delta planform tested from a Mach number of 0.1 to a Mach number of 1.9 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1961), by R. W. Hess, Langley Research Center, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and calculated results of a flutter investigation of some very low aspect-ratio flat-plate surfaces at Mach numbers from 0.62 to 3.00 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1959), by Perry W. Hanson, Gilbert M. Levey, and United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Flutter of T-tails with dihedral : report on tests at David Taylor Model Basin. (Martin, 1957), by R. L. Goldman (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Supersonic flutter of airframes with flexible bodies, 24 April 1961 : final report 8 April 1960-7 April 1961 (Midwest Research Institute, 1961), by John E. Yates and Edmond F. E. Zeijdel (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Supersonic flutter of airframes with flexible bodies, 31 December 1962 : Final report 25 October 1961-24 November 1962. (Midwest Research Institute, 1962), by John E. Yates (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Construction and testing of a doubly-flexible flutter model of a delta wing. (M.I.T. Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory, 1955), by Michael M. Chen (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Comparative flutter calculations on low-aspect-ratio wings in incompressible and supersonic flows. (M.I.T. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, 1954), by Garabed Zartarian, Herbert M. Voss, and Pao Tan Hsu (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Synthesis of beam-network structures for low-aspect-ratio flutter models. (M.I.T. Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory, 1955), by Michael M. Chen and Sidney I. Gravitz (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Application of numerical integration techniques to the low-aspect-ratio flutter problem in subsonic and supersonic flows (Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1954), by Herbert M. Voss, Garabed Zartarian, Pao Tan Hsu, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Flutter of low aspect-ratio wings. ([Cambridge, Mass.], 1957), by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Elimination of flutter in the radio flash code (Los Alamos, New Mexico : Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California, 1968., 1968), by Robert D. Richtmyer, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (page images at HathiTrust)
• Supersonic flutter analyses including aerodynamic heating effects (Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 1960., 1960), by R. L. Harder, United States. Air Force. Air Research and Development Command, Wright Air Development Center, and Pasadena California Institute of Technology (page images at HathiTrust)
• Supersonic panel flutter (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Wright Air Development Division, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 1957., 1957), by Yudell L. Luke, Andrew St. John, United States. Air Force. Air Research and Development Command, Midwest Research Institute, and Wright Air Development Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• A study of wing flutter (Washington, D.C. : G.P.O., 1928., 1928), by A. F. Zahm, Ernest E. Wilson, United States National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and United States. Navy. Bureau of Construction and Repair. Aerodynamical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Low frequency instabilities of free systems (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1963., 1963), by Robert G. Schwendler, Jack H. Hill, Computer Engineering Associates, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (Ohio), and United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental investigation of flutter in cascades with zero incidence and stagger (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Wright Air Development Center, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 1956., 1956), by Robert J. Vaccaro, Wright Air Development Center, New York University. College of Engineering, and United States. Air Force. Air Research and Development Command (page images at HathiTrust; US access only)
• Further studies on high-speed unsteady flow (Wright-Patterson Air Force Systems Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1962., 1962), by Garabed Zartarian, Harry Sauerwein, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Basic principles of the indicial lifting-surface flutter-analysis procedure (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1962., 1962), by Bernard Mazelsky, Harry B. Amey, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division, and Aerojet-General Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• Active flutter suppression on an aeroelastically tailored HiMAT vehicle (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1979., 1979), by John H. Wykes, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and Rockwell International. Los Angeles Aircraft Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Evaluations of methods to predict flutter of wings with external stores (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1970., 1970), by Sidney Siegel, Lowell V. Andrew, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and North American Rockwell Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• Theoretical and experimental studies on airloads related to hypersonic aeroelastic problems of general slender pointed configurations (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Aeronautical Systems Division, Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1961., 1961), by Garabed Zartarian, Pao Tan Hsu, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aeroelastic and Structures Research Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)
• Supersonic speed flutter analysis of circular panels with edges elastically restrained against rotation (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Wright Air Development Division, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 1960., 1960), by L. E. Goodman, Jasti Venkata Rattayya, University of Minnesota. Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, United States. Wright Air Development Division, and United States. Air Force. Air Research and Development Command (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and theoretical panel flutter studies in the mach number range of 1.0 to 5.0 : supplement 1 (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1965., 1965), by E. H. Dowell, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division, and Boeing Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Relationship between flutter parameters and generalized aerodynamic forces for wings of low aspect ratio (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1962., 1962), by Bernard Mazelsky, Harry B. Amey, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division, and Aerojet-General Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• Subsonic flutter characteristics of a variable sweep wing and horizontal tail combination (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1970., 1970), by Walter J. Mykytow, Michael H. Shirk, Lawrence J. Huttsell, Thomas E. Noll, and Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental and theoretical panel flutter studies in the mach number range of 1.0 to 5.0 (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1963., 1963), by E. H. Dowell, H. M. Voss, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and Boeing Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Reduced order modeling for aero-elastic simulations (Arlington, Virginia. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 2006., 2006), by M. J. Balas, University of Wyoming. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Unsteady aerodynamics for advanced configurations. Part IV. Application of the supersonic mach box method to intersecting planar lifting surfaces (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1965., 1965), by M. T. Moore, L. V. Andrew, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and North American Aviation. Space and Information Systems Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Fluid, structure and control interaction (Bolling Air Force Base, D.C. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 1998., 1998), by D. J. Inman, Jens Cattarius, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Simulation of the transient aeroelastic response of a realistic aircraft configuration during three-dimensional high G maneuvers (Arlington, Virginia. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 2001., 2001), by Charbel Farhat, University of Colorado Boulder. Department of Aerospace Engineering, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Experimental studies of the unstedy aerodynamics of panels at or near flutter with a finite boundary layer Mach number 1 to 10 (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1964., 1964), by G. W. Asher, A. W. Brown, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and Boeing Aerospace Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Commercial supersonic tansport panel flutter studies (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1964., 1964), by C. H. Hodson, J. E. Stocker, North American Aviation, United States. Federal Aviation Agency, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, and Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancement Volume I. ASTROS users manual (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1993., 1993), by D. J. Neill, David L. Herendeen, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, and Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• Comparative experimental and theoretical studies of the flutter of flat panels in a low supersonic flow (Washington, D.C. : United States Air Force, Office of Scientific Research, 1961., 1961), by M. H. Lock, Y. C. Fung, United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research, and California Institute of Technology (page images at HathiTrust)
• Unsteady aerodynamics for advanced configurations. Part V. Unsteady potential flow around slender bodies at angles of attack (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1965., 1965), by T. C. Li, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and North American Aviation. Space and Information Systems Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancements. Volume I, ASTROS user's manual (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, United States Air Force, 1995., 1995), by D. J. Neill, David L. Herendeen, and Ohio) Wright Laboratory (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (page images at HathiTrust)
• Tests of a wind tunnel flutter model. Phase I, The critical flutter speed as a function of control surface dynamic balance and natural frequencies of vibration (Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio : War Department, Air Corps, Material Division, 1938., 1938), by Benjamin Smilg and United States. Army Air Forces. Air Matériel Command (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancement Volume II. ASTROS programmer's manual (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1993., 1993), by D. J. Neill, R. L. Hoesly, David L. Herendeen, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, and Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• Unsteady aerodynamics for advanced configurations. Part II A transonic box method for planar lifting surfaces (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1965., 1965), by E. R. Rodemich, L. V. Andrew, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), and North American Aviation. Space and Information Systems Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Influence of structural and aerodynamic modeling on flutter analysis and structural optimization (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1991., 1991), by Alfred G. Struz, Ohio) Wright Laboratory (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and University of Oklahoma. School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (page images at HathiTrust)
• Flutter and vibration analysis by a modal method : analytical development and computational procedure (Inglewood, California : Space Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1963., 1963), by William P. Rodden, Heather A. Malcom, Edith F. Farkas, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Space Systems Division, and Aerospace Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancements. Volume II, ASTROS programmer's manual (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, United States Air Force, 1995., 1995), by D. J. Neill, R. L. Hoesly, David L. Herendeen, and Ohio) Wright Laboratory (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancement final report (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1995., 1995), by David L. Herendeen, D. J. Neill, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, and Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• ASTROS enhancements. Volume III, ASTROS theoretical manual (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, United States Air Force, 1995., 1995), by D. J. Neill, V. B. Venkayya, David L. Herendeen, and Ohio) Wright Laboratory (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (page images at HathiTrust)
• The flutter of two-bay flat panels of infinite span at supersonic Mach numbers (Los Angeles, California : Ballistic Systems and Space Systems Divisions, Los Angeles Air Force Station, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1964., 1964), by M. H. Lock, Edith F. Farkas, United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Space Systems Division, and Aerospace Corporation. Laboratory Operations (page images at HathiTrust)
• A formulation of nonlinear limit cycle oscillation problems in aircraft flutter (Bolling Air Force Base, D.C. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force, 1993., 1993), by Warren C. Chen, John Dugundji, United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (page images at HathiTrust)
• Extend MANPADS M & S capabilities to include energetic materials, fragmentation effects, and wing flutter response (Arlington, Virginia. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 2005., 2005), by Ronald L. Hinrichsen, Brian D. Choules, Monty A. Moshier, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Predicting the nonlinear response of aerospace structures using aeroelastic NS solutions on deforming meshes (Arlington, Virginia. : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 2001., 2001), by Rathinam Panneer Selvam, Uday K. Roy, Qun Zheng, Zu-Qing Qu, Fayetteville. Civil Engineering University of Arkansas, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Real-time predictive flutter analysis and continuous paramter identification of accelerating aircraft (Arlington, Virginia : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 2001., 2001), by Charbel Farhat, University of Colorado Boulder. |b Department of Aerospace Engineering, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• Validation tools of nonlinearities associated with aeroelastic phenomena (Arlington, Virginia : Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, 2004., 2004), by Muhammad R. Hajj, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, and United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research (page images at HathiTrust)
• A compilation of the mathematics leading to the doublet-lattice method (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Fliight Dynamics Directorate, Air Force Wright Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1992., 1992), by Max Blair and Ohio) Wright Laboratory (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (page images at HathiTrust)
• Unsteady aerodynamics for advanced configurations. Part III. Elliptic-conical wing in linearized unsteady transonic flow (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1965., 1965), by E. Albano, L. V. Andrew, United States. Air Force. Systems Command, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Flight Dynamics Laboratory, and North American Aviation. Space and Information Systems Division (page images at HathiTrust)
• Computer techniques for the rapid flutter clearance of aircraft carrying external stores. Part I, Perturbation theory and applications (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1973., 1973), by A. K. Cross, E. A. Albano, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), Northrop Corporation. Aircraft Division, and United States. Air Force. Systems Command (page images at HathiTrust)
• An Experimental investigation of means to suppress the flutter motion of elastically suspended cylinders exposed to uniform cross flow (White Oak, Maryland : United States Naval Ordance Laboratory, 1972., 1972), by J. Berezow and Md.) Naval Ordnance Laboratory (White Oak (page images at HathiTrust)
• Adaptive control of wing/store flutter (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio : Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, 1979., 1979), by C. A. Harvey, G. Stein, T. L. Johnson, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (U.S.), Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, and Honeywell Systems and Research Center (page images at HathiTrust)
• Theoretical investigation of the flutter characteristics of a jet-flap rotor system in hovering flight. (Obtainable from Armed Services Technical Information Agency], 1961), by Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (page images at HathiTrust)

More items available under broader and related terms at left.