The Online Books Page

Railroads -- United States -- Cases

See also what's at your library, or elsewhere.

• Railroads -- United States
• Public utilities -- United States -- Cases
• Transportation -- United States -- Cases
• Trusts, Industrial -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- Cases

• Railroad law -- United States -- Cases
• Street-railroads -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- New Hampshire -- Cases
• Collective labor agreements -- Railroads -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- Employees -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- Employees -- Pensions -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- Finance -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cases
• Railroads -- United States -- Cars -- Patents -- Cases
• Railroads -- United States -- Employees -- Cases
• Railroads -- United States -- Finance -- Cases
• Railroads -- United States -- Management -- Cases
• Railroads -- United States -- Rates -- Cases
• Railroads -- Valuation -- United States -- Cases
• Wages -- Railroads -- United States -- Cases

• Arbitration board no. 192, N. M. B. case A-4400 (n.p., 1953), by United States National Mediation Board, Western Carriers' Conference Committee, Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committee, Eastern Carriers' Conference Committee, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• The Boston, Concord and Montreal Railroad vs. the Boston and Lowell Railroad Corporation : [Documents admitted to evidence.] (s.n., 1887), by Concord Boston, Charles Doe, United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), and Boston and Lowell Railroad Corporation (page images at HathiTrust)

• Leading American railway cases : on most of the important questions involved in the law of railways, arranged according to subjects (Little, Brown, and company, 1870), by Isaac F. Redfield (page images at HathiTrust)
• Railroads; cases and selections (The Macmillan Company, 1925), by Eliot Jones and Homer Bews Vanderblue (page images at HathiTrust)
• The government and railroad transportation (Ginn, 1930), by Albert R. Ellingwood and Whitney Coombs (page images at HathiTrust)
• The United States of America, appellant, vs. the Union Pacific railroad company et al., respondents. Appellant's brief of facts ([Place of publication not identified], 1912), by United States Department of Justice, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• Records and briefs brought under the Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies, of 1890 in the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah and the Supreme Court of the United States. ([n.p., 1914), by Southern Pacific Company, United States Supreme Court, United States. District Court (Utah), and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• Before the Interstate commerce commission. In the matter of the application of the Great northern railway company, etc., Finance docket no. 7439. In the matter of the application of the Western Pacific railroad company, etc. Finance docket no. 7440. In the matter of the application of the Great northern railway company and the Western Pacific railroad company, etc. Finance docket no. 7781 ... (San Francisco, 1930), by Great Northern Railway Company (U.S.), Ben C. Dey, F. G. Dorety, United States Interstate Commerce Commission, Los Angeles & Salt Lake railroad company, Oregon-Washington Railroad and Navigation Company, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Company, and Western Pacific Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Before the Interstate commerce commission. Arlington Heights fruit exchange et al., complainants, vs. Southern Pacific company, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe railway company, et al., defendants. Docket no. 3000 ... (s.n., 1910), by complainant Arlington Heights Fruit Exchange, Meyer Mayer, Topeka Atchison, Southern Pacific Company, and United States Interstate Commerce Commission (page images at HathiTrust)
• The United States of America, appellant, vs. Union Pacific railroad company, et al. : brief (with appendix) for appellees, Union Pacific railroad company, Oregon short line railroad company, Oregon railroad & navigation company, Southern Pacific company (s.n., 1912), by P. F. Dunne, United States, and Union Pacific Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Cases relating to the law of railways : decided in the Supreme Court of the United States, and in the courts of the several States (Little, Brown, and Company, 1857), by United States Supreme Court, Samuel W. Bates, and Chauncey Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• The United States of America, petitioner v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Lehigh Valley Coal Company, Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Company, Coxe Brothers and Company, Inc., Delaware, Susquehanna and Schuylkill Railroad Company, New York and Middle Coal Field Railroad and Coal Company, The G.B. Markle Company, Girard Trust Company, Eben B. Thomas, Lyman D. Smith, Edward Tk. Stotesbury, Daniel G. Reid, Charles Steele, Abram Nesbit, George F. Baer, Edward B. Smith, William H. Moore, Edward S. Moore, William R. Butler, Henry B. Coxe, and Fred M. Kirby, defendants. Brief for the United States. (Gov. Prtg. Off., 1914), by United States. District Court (New York : Southern District) (page images at HathiTrust)
• The American and English railroad cases. New series : a collection of all cases affecting railroads of every kind, decided by the courts of appellate jurisdiction in the United States, England, and Canada. (E. Thompson, 1895), by Thomas Johnson Michie and Frank C. Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois, in chancery (G. Hornstein Co., 1908), by Illinois. Superior Court (Cook County), Stuyvesant Fish, John A. Kasson, George F. Edmunds, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Railway Securities Company, and Illinois Central Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Reply brief for defendants, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Railroad Securities Company ([Chicago, 1908), by Illinois. Superior Court (Cook County), Stuyvesant Fish, John Adam Kasson, George F. Edmunds, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Railway Securities Company, and Illinois Central Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Cases relating to the law of railways, decided in the Supreme Court of the United States, and in the courts of the several States (Little, Brown, 1854), by United States Supreme Court, Samuel Worcester Bates, and Chauncey Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• The American and English railroad cases; a collection of all the railroad cases in the courts of last resort in America and England (E. Thompson, 1881), by William M. McKinney, Lawrence Lewis, Great Britain. Courts, and United States. Courts (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California (The James H. Barry Co., 1916., 1916), by Equitable Trust Company of New York and Western Pacific Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Cases relating to the law of railways : decided in the Supreme Court of the United States and in the courts of several states (Little, Brown and company, 1857), by United States Supreme Court, Samuel Worcester Bates, and Chauncey Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• Cases relating to the law of railways : decided in the Supreme Court of the United States, and in the courts of the several States (Little, Brown, and Company, 1854), by United States Supreme Court, Samuel W. Bates, and Chauncey Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• Special court reporter. (Corporate Reorganization Reporter, 1976), by Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 United States. Special Court (page images at HathiTrust)
• Railroad reports. (Michie company, 1895), by Thomas Johnson Michie and Frank C. Smith (page images at HathiTrust)
• Leading American railway cases : on many of the important questions involved in the law of railways : arranged according to subjects (Little, Brown, and Company, 1872), by Isaac F. Redfield (page images at HathiTrust)
• Cases on railroad law (West Pub. Co., 1896), by Simeon E. Baldwin (page images at HathiTrust)
• Minority stockholder and of the railway security holder, Rights of the (Baker, Voorhis & o., 1929), by Richard Selden Harvey (page images at HathiTrust)
• Principles of Canadian railway law with the Canadian jurisprudence and the leading English and American cases, to which is added the Dominion railway act as amended up to 1886, with references to the provincial statutes of Ontario and Quebec, forms of proceedings in expropriation and a complete index (A. Périard, 1885), by Chas. M. Holt (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Supreme Court of the United States. October Term, 1903. No. 277. Northern Securities Company et al. v. The United States : Oral argument of the attorney-general for the United States. ([Washington, 1903), by United States Supreme Court (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Circuit Court of the United States District of South Dakota (The Gunthorp-Warren Printing Company, 1898), by Milwaukee Chicago (page images at HathiTrust)
• No. 275. In the Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1909 (Govt. Print. Off., 1909), by United States Department of Justice, Oregon and California Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Company, and United States Interstate Commerce Commission (page images at HathiTrust)
• Northern Securities Company, the Great Northern Railway Company, the Northern Pacific Railway Company, and others, appellants, v. the United States, respondent (s.n., 1903), by Charles Fisk Beach, United States Supreme Court, United States, Northern Pacific Railway Company, Great Northern Railway Company (U.S.), and Northern Securities Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• The Stockton & Visalia Railroad Co., petitioner, vs. the Common Council of the City of Stockton, respondent. Reply of the Southern Pacific R.R. Co. to the third and last brief of the respondent. (H.S. Crocker & Co., Printers, 1870), by S. W. Sanderson, H.S. Crocker & Co, Southern Pacific Company, Calif. Common Council Stockton, and Stockton and Visalia Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transcript of record. Supreme court of the United States, October term, 1903. No. 277. The Northern securities company, the Great Northern railway company, the Northern Pacific railway company, James J. Hill [etc.] vs. the United States. (Judd & Detweiler, printers, 1903), by Northern Securities Company, James J. Hill, United States, United States. Circuit Court (8th Circuit), Northern Pacific Railway Company, and Great Northern Railway Company (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust)
• Recapture clause case. (Govt. print. off., 1923), by United States Department of Justice, James M. Beck, and Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Comapny (page images at HathiTrust)
• In equity, no. (Publisher not identified, 1906), by United States, Lewellyn A. Shaver, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company, United States Interstate Commerce Commission, and Eastern Division) United States. Circuit Court (Mississippi : Northern District (page images at HathiTrust)
• The United States of America, petitioner, v. the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company and others, defendants. Original petition. (Gov. Prtg. Off., 1914), by United States. District Court (New York : Southern District) (page images at HathiTrust)

• Street railway reports, annotated. Reporting the electric railway and street railway decisions of the Federal and State courts in the United States. Edited (M. Bender, 1904), by Frank B. Gilbert (page images at HathiTrust)
• Street railway reports, annotated. Reporting the electric railway and street railway decisions of the Federal and State courts in the United States. Edited (M. Bender, 1904), by Frank B. Gilbert (page images at HathiTrust)
• American street-railway decisions. A collection of cases decided in the various courts within the United States and Canada.[1841-1864] (American Street-railway Association, 1890), by Charles A. Richardson (page images at HathiTrust)

• Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad v. State of New Hampshire. Plaintiff's additional argument on questions 5 and 6. ([n.p., 1880), by Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company and New Hampshire (page images at HathiTrust)

• Interpretations issued by the National Mediation Board pursuant to section 5, second of the Railway Labor Act. (U.S. G.P.O., 1961), by United States National Mediation Board (page images at HathiTrust)
• Arbitration award pursuant to PL No. 100-429 (S.J. Resolution 374) signed September 8, 1988 : to render an award between the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company and the United Transportation Union, concerning the unresolved issues regarding the implementation of the report and recommendations issued by Emergency Board No. 213 ([The Board], 1988), by United States. Arbitration Board No. 490, United Transportation Union, and Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (page images at HathiTrust)

• Interpretations issued by the National Mediation Board pursuant to section 5, second of the Railway Labor Act. (U.S. G.P.O., 1961), by United States National Mediation Board (page images at HathiTrust)
• Arbitration award pursuant to PL No. 100-429 (S.J. Resolution 374) signed September 8, 1988 : to render an award between the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company and the United Transportation Union, concerning the unresolved issues regarding the implementation of the report and recommendations issued by Emergency Board No. 213 ([The Board], 1988), by United States. Arbitration Board No. 490, United Transportation Union, and Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (page images at HathiTrust)

• Railroad Retirement Board bulletin (The Board ;, 1939), by United States Railroad Retirement Board (page images at HathiTrust)
• Transcript of record : United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, October term 1936, no. 6868 : Railroad Retirement Board and Murray W. Latimer, James A. Dailey, and Lee M. Eddy, individually and as members of the Railroad Retirement Board, and Guy T. Helvering, individually and as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, appellants vs. the Alton Railroad Company and others : appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, filed October 22, 1936. (U.S. G.P.O., 1936), by United States Railroad Retirement Board, Murray Webb Latimer, Alton Railroad Company, and United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit) (page images at HathiTrust)

• Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States (The Commission :, 1907), by United States Interstate Commerce Commission (page images at HathiTrust)

• Decisions of the Surface Transportation Board of the United States (Surface Transportation Board of the United States, 1996), by United States. Surface Transportation Board (page images at HathiTrust)

• In the United States Circuit Court, Northern District of Illinois, in equity, Pullman's Palace Car Co. vs. Wagner Palace Car Co. and the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., motion for injunction, pendente lite : abstract of points taken in the closing argument on the motion by B.F. Thurston (Barnard & Gunthorp, legal printers, 1888), by Pullman's Palace Car Company and B. F. Thurston (page images at HathiTrust)

• Decisions of the United States Railroad Labor Board with addenda and interpretations. (G.P.O., 1920), by United States Railroad Labor Board (page images at HathiTrust)
• Decisions of Railway Boards of Adjustment nos. 1, 2, and 3 to December 31, 1918. (U.S. G.P.O., 1919), by United States Railroad Administration (page images at HathiTrust)

• Interstate commerce reports v. 6-11 (L.K. Strouse, 1888), by United States Interstate Commerce Commission (page images at HathiTrust)

More items available under narrower terms.