The Online Books Page

United States -- Trials, litigation, etc.

See also what's at your library, or elsewhere.

• United States
• Trials, litigation, etc.

• Connecticut -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Georgia -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Illinois -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Louisiana -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Maryland -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Massachusetts -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Michigan -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Missouri -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• New York (State) -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Oregon -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Pennsylvania -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Monopolies -- United States -- Trials, litigation, etc.
• Plumbing fixtures industry -- United States -- Trials, litigation, etc.

• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 1999), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 2000), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 2000), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2008 : hearing before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, second session, on H.R. 5884, July 31, 2008. (U.S. G.P.O. :, 2009), by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law (page images at HathiTrust)
• Ashcroft v. Iqbal (U.S. G.P.O. :, 2010), by Civil Rights United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution (page images at HathiTrust)
• Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2009 : hearing before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on H.R. 1508, June 4, 2009. (U.S. G.P.O. :, 2010), by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law (page images at HathiTrust)
• The Sunshine in Litigation Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, second session on S. 1404 ... April 20, 1994. (U.S. G.P.O. :, 1995), by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice (page images at HathiTrust)
• Removal Clarification Act of 2010 : hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, on H.R. 5281, May 25, 2010. (U.S. G.P.O. :, 2010), by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy (page images at HathiTrust)
• Argument of Sam C. Reid, Jr. before the Court of Claims in the case of private armed brig-of-war General Armstrong, on a rehearing, January 27, 1857. ([s.n.], 1857), by Samuel C. Reid, Stephen Arnold Douglas, and United States. Court of Claims (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America, petitioner vs. International Harvester Company and others, defendants : statement, brief and argument for defendants. (Gunthorp-Warren Print. Co., 1913), by United States, United States. District Court (Minnesota), and International Harvester Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America vs. Economy Light and Power Company : in chancery no. 29776 : abstract of proofs. (Gunthorp-Warren Print. Co., 1912), by United States, United States. District Court (Illinois : Northern District : Eastern Division), and Economy Light and Power Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America, complainant, v. the Union Pacific Railroad Company ... et al., defendants (U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1909), by United States and Union Pacific Railroad Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Settlement between the US government and NextWave Telecom Inc. to resolve disputed spectrum licenses (U.S. G.P.O. :, 2002), by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America, petitioner, vs. International Harvester Company, et al., defendants : transcript of proceedings. (s.n., 1912), by United States, United States. District Court (Minnesota), and International Harvester Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America, petitioner vs. International Harvester Company and others, defendants : statement, brief and argument for defendants. (Gunthorp-Warren Print. Co., 1913), by United States, United States. District Court (Minnesota), and International Harvester Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Northern Securities Company, the Great Northern Railway Company, the Northern Pacific Railway Company, and others, appellants, v. the United States, respondent (s.n., 1903), by Charles Fisk Beach, United States Supreme Court, United States, Northern Pacific Railway Company, Great Northern Railway Company (U.S.), and Northern Securities Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• Nicaragua v. United States of America : counter-memorial (U.S. Dept. of State?, 1984), by United States, International Court of Justice, and United States. Dept. of State (page images at HathiTrust)
• Report of proceedings in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New-York, on a suit brought by the United States against Daniel D. Tomkins, June 3, 1822 : containing the testimony at large, the speeches of the defendent, and of the counsel on both sides, together with the judge's charge (Printed by C.S. Van Winkle, 1822), by United States and Daniel D. Tompkins (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Circuit court of the United States for the Eastern division of the Eastern judicial district of Missouri. United States of America v. Standard oil company of New Jersey, and others. No. ([St. Louis?, 1906), by United States vs. Standard oil co. et al, Eastern district) United States. District attorney (Missouri, United States. Circuit Court (8th Circuit), Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, and Standard Oil Company (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America, plaintiff, v. Western Electric Company, Inc. and American Telephone and Telegraph, defendants ([U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division], 1986), by United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division, United States District Court (District of Columbia), American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Western Electric Company (page images at HathiTrust)

• Connecticut; Old John Uncas and the Greater Part of the Tribe of Moheagan Indians, by Samuel Mason Their Guardian, Appellants; The Governor and Company of the English Colony of Connecticut in New England in America, and George Richards, Esq. ,and Several Other Persons, Intruders on the Lands in Question, Respondents: The Appellants Case (ca. 1770), by Charles Yorke and Fowler Walker (multiple formats at archive.org)

• The Case of the Cherokee Nation Against the State of Georgia, Argued and Determined at the Supreme Court of the United States, January Term, 1831; With an Appendix (Philadelphia: J. Grigg, 1831), ed. by Richard Peters
  • multiple formats at archive.org
  • page images at HathiTrust
• Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia: With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States, by John Marshall (Gutenberg ebook)

• People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel. Charles S. Deneen, Governor, and William H. Stead, Attorney General, appellant, vs. Economy Light and Power Company, appellee : Chancery, Appeal from Circuit Court, Grundy County, abstract of record. (Gunthorp-Warren Printing Co., 1909), by Ill.) Economy Light and Power Company (Chicago, Illinois. Supreme Court, and Illinois (page images at HathiTrust)
• The people of the state of Illinois, on the relation of Edward F. Dunne, governor, and Patrick J. Lucey, attorney general, plaintiff in error, vs. Economy Light & Power Company, defendant in error : error to the Supreme Court of Illinois, brief and argument for defendant in error. (Gunthorp-Warren Printing Co., 1913), by Illinois, United States Supreme Court, and Ill.) Economy Light and Power Company (Chicago (page images at HathiTrust)

• Petition for mandamus (Horace O'Donoghue, brief and abstract printer, 1887), by John P. Neal, Jesse B. Barton, James L. High, and Lawrence J. Gutter Collection of Chicagoana (University of Illinois at Chicago) (page images at HathiTrust)
• Petition for rehearing (Horace O'Donoghue, brief and abstract printer, 1887), by John P. Neal, James L. High, and Lawrence J. Gutter Collection of Chicagoana (University of Illinois at Chicago) (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois (G. P. O., 1913), by James H. Wilkerson and United States. District Court (Illinois : Northern District) (page images at HathiTrust)

• People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel. Charles S. Deneen, Governor, and William H. Stead, Attorney General, appellant, vs. Economy Light and Power Company, appellee : Chancery, Appeal from Circuit Court, Grundy County, abstract of record. (Gunthorp-Warren Printing Co., 1909), by Ill.) Economy Light and Power Company (Chicago, Illinois. Supreme Court, and Illinois (page images at HathiTrust)
• The people of the state of Illinois, on the relation of Edward F. Dunne, governor, and Patrick J. Lucey, attorney general, plaintiff in error, vs. Economy Light & Power Company, defendant in error : error to the Supreme Court of Illinois, brief and argument for defendant in error. (Gunthorp-Warren Printing Co., 1913), by Illinois, United States Supreme Court, and Ill.) Economy Light and Power Company (Chicago (page images at HathiTrust)

• Statutes of Spain, Spanish writers, and other authorities, quoted in the argument for the states of Louisiana and Maryland against the executors of John McDonogh. (Alex. Levy and Co., 1852), by Alfred Hennen and Louisiana (page images at HathiTrust)
• The states of Louisiana & Maryland, vs. the executors of John McDonogh and the cities of New Orleans & Baltimore : argument for the cities (Printed by J.L. Sollée, 1852), by Alex. Grailhe and Louisiana. Supreme Court (page images at HathiTrust)

• The states of Louisiana & Maryland, vs. the executors of John McDonogh and the cities of New Orleans & Baltimore : argument for the cities (Printed by J.L. Sollée, 1852), by Alex. Grailhe and Louisiana. Supreme Court (page images at HathiTrust)

• Statutes of Spain, Spanish writers, and other authorities, quoted in the argument for the states of Louisiana and Maryland against the executors of John McDonogh. (Alex. Levy and Co., 1852), by Alfred Hennen and Louisiana (page images at HathiTrust)
• The states of Louisiana & Maryland, vs. the executors of John McDonogh and the cities of New Orleans & Baltimore : argument for the cities (Printed by J.L. Sollée, 1852), by Alex. Grailhe and Louisiana. Supreme Court (page images at HathiTrust)

• The case of the Roxbury flats with a note on the early government and legislation of the Massachusetts Colony and the title in the sea shore of Massachusetts. (Cambridge : Riverside Press, [1858?], 1858), by Horace Gray (page images at HathiTrust)

• Argument of William H. Seward, in Defence of Abel F. Fitch and Others, Under an Indictment for Arson, by William H. Seward (page images at MOA)

• State of Missouri, plaintiff, vs. Parker Distilling Company, defendant : charged with manufacturing liquor without a license (State of Missouri?, 1909), by Missouri, Elliott W. Major, Missouri. Court of Criminal Correction (Saint Louis County), and Parker Distilling Company (page images at HathiTrust)

• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 1999), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 2000), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia :, 2000), by United States District Court (District of Columbia), Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft Corporation, and United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• Case against nightwork for women (National Consumers' League, 1918), by Louis D. Brandeis, Josephine Goldmark, Charles. press. a corporation. New York. defendant-appellant Schweinler, Charles Schweinler Press, and New York (State) (page images at HathiTrust)

• The Case for the Shorter Work Day: Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1915, Franklin O. Bunting, Plaintiff in Error, vs. the State of Oregon, Defendant in Error: Brief for the Defendant in Error (reprint, 2 volumes in 1; New York: National Consumers League, 1916), by Felix Frankfurter and Josephine Goldmark (multiple formats at archive.org)
• Women in industry : decision of the United States Supreme Court in Curt Muller vs. State of Oregon : upholding the constitutionality of the Oregon ten hour law for women and brief for the State of Oregon ([s.n., 1908), by United States Supreme Court, Curt Muller, Josephine Goldmark, Louis D. Brandeis, National Consumers' League, and Oregon (page images at HathiTrust)

• Report of the Case of Edward Prigg Against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, at January ,term, 1842, In Which It Was Decided That All the Laws of the Several States Relative to Fugitive Slaves Are Unconstitutional and Void, and That Congress Have the Exclusive Power of Legislation on the Subject of Fugitive Slaves Escaping Into Other States (Philadelphia: L. Johnson, 1842), ed. by Richard Peters (multiple formats at archive.org)
• Case of Edward Prigg against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Negro Universities Press, 1970), by Edward Prigg, Richard Peters, United States Supreme Court, and Pennsylvania (page images at HathiTrust)

• In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern district of California, Southern division : the United States of America, petitioner, v. Pacific Coast Plumber Supply Association and others, defendants, petition in equity (Government Printing Office, 1911), by United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern district of California, Southern division : the United States of America, petitioner, v. Pacific Coast Plumber Supply Association and others, defendants, decree of injunction. (Government Printing Office, 1913), by United States (page images at HathiTrust)

• In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern district of California, Southern division : the United States of America, petitioner, v. Pacific Coast Plumber Supply Association and others, defendants, petition in equity (Government Printing Office, 1911), by United States (page images at HathiTrust)
• In the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern district of California, Southern division : the United States of America, petitioner, v. Pacific Coast Plumber Supply Association and others, defendants, decree of injunction. (Government Printing Office, 1913), by United States (page images at HathiTrust)

More items available under narrower terms.