The Online Books Page

Charles Lux et al. vs. James B. Haggin et al. Opinion filed April 26, 1886. Stetson & Houghton, plaintiffs' attorneys. McAllister & Berin, of counsel. Louis T. Haggin, defendant's attorney. Garber, Thornton & Bishop, Flournoy & Mhoon, of counsel.

Title:Charles Lux et al. vs. James B. Haggin et al. Opinion filed April 26, 1886. Stetson & Houghton, plaintiffs' attorneys. McAllister & Berin, of counsel. Louis T. Haggin, defendant's attorney. Garber, Thornton & Bishop, Flournoy & Mhoon, of counsel.
Author:
Author:
Author:
Author:
Author:
Note:[San Francisco?, 1886
  
Link:
No stable link:This is an uncurated book entry from our extended bookshelves, readable online now but without a stable link here. You should not bookmark this page, but you can request that we add this book to our curated collection, which has stable links.
  
Subject:Riparian rights -- California
Other copies:Look for editions of this book at your library, or elsewhere.

Help with reading books -- Report a bad link -- Suggest a new listing

Home -- Search -- New Listings -- Authors -- Titles -- Subjects -- Serials

Books -- News -- Features -- Archives -- The Inside Story

Edited by John Mark Ockerbloom (onlinebooks@pobox.upenn.edu)
OBP copyrights and licenses.