Re: copyright of photoreproduced text
- From: Ryan Henrie <ryan@[redacted]>
- Subject: Re: copyright of photoreproduced text
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:51:11 -0600
Ok, let's put this to the test. A perfect example of this is the "facsimile of
the First Edition" of Blackstone's Commentaries that I have on my desk.
Open the first page, and it says:
1979 by the University of Chicago
All rights Reserved. Published 1979
Printed in the United States of America
Now, I can see them claiming copyright on the new introduction by Stanley Katz,
but the copyright notice should have specified this, no?
Can I OCR the book and put it on the web? Their blanket copyright statement
would imply that I can't (without their permission), yet the text has been in
the public domain for, oh, say 200 years!
Comments?
Ryan
"C. Perry Willett" wrote:
>
> Ben Crowell wrote:
> > Does anybody know the extent to which a photoreproduction
> > of an uncopyrighted text can be copyrighted?
>
> Here's a discussion on the same topic from Humanist.
>
> Perry Willett
> Main Library
> Indiana University
> pwillett@[redacted]
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:55:33 +0100
> From: Nicholas Finke <nfinke1@[redacted]>
> Subject: Re: 15.160 image copyright: implications for us?
>
> As someone who used to teach US Copyright law, the decision in Bridgeman
> seems correct and straightforward. It simply states that there can be no
> copyright where there is no originality. Since someone who creates a copy
> of a manuscript page for scholarly use is specifically trying not to add
> anything to the original, but merely to reproduce it as faithfully as
> possible, copyright will not apply.