(No subject)
- From: "Leslie Evans" <lbevans@[redacted]>
- Subject: (No subject)
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:38:06 -0700
I was surprised at the flame letters I got from the venerable Michael
Hart, and Michael Stutz. It what appeared to be a dry discussion over
terminology (etext vs. ebook) we got a venting of considerable hostility
toward commercial contemporary digital publications. I have no
investment at all in the terms etext or ebook, though I prefer ebook
because it is books that I am interested in. But what I saw in the
Hart-Stutz letters was a dismissal of newly written books for sale in
digital format. This really surprised me. I can agree that the super
copy protected formats now used by the big publishers reduce even my
interest to zero, but that is because I don't read etexts (I will use
Michael Hart's terminology) on screens but with a text to speech engine
that cannot access such files; if they came with an adequate audio
reader I would feel quite differently about it. But there is also a
cottage industry of small publishers all over the English-speaking world
who offer new authors at modest prices in HTML or other accessible
formats. I am not ready to predict that these will all disappear for
lack of interest. Should etexts be limited to high class literature that
is out of copywright, i.e., 70 years old? I balance my ebook recording
and listening between these classic (and free) books, and buying ebooks
from contemporary authors. I cannot use any of the highly copy protected
books circulated by Barnes and Noble etc. and do not buy those. But I
often buy books from the little "presses," usually at $5 to $7 a book,
just to get something contemporary. And at least a few of them are
surprisingly good (for example, Online Originals,
http://www.onlineoriginals.com/). I am not at all ready to predict as
Hart and Stutz do that these will rapidly disappear for lack of
interest; given the success of the Internet in connecting niche market
purveyers with their potential audience, small publishers may well be
able to stay afloat indefinitely. If there is no interest in reading
contemporary material in digital format why should there be a sustained
interest in reading much older material in this more or less difficult
format?
There is an extremely valuable service being performed by the Gutenberg
in particular in digital preservation, and in promotion of the library
model of free mass availability. It is also very objectionable that
publishers are trying to use intellectual property rights and copyright
to throttle distribution of works that should be in the public domain.
All this aside, there is also a place in the digital world for sales of
new material, whether it conforms to the free model or does not. In the
paper world we have libraries in which there are free books, and book
stores in which there is a price tag. There would be no libraries if
publishers did not have bookstores in which to make back their costs,
and it is not surprising that publishers try to prevent free copying of
their current line. To this extent I agree with the two Michaels: I do
not think there is a mass market at this time for digital works, old or
new. Paper is still more portable in most situations for the vast
majority of readers. Few people are really going to sit at computer
screens to read books, and books in Palm Pilots are for use in doctor's
offices and will not be read fast enough to make much of a commercial
market. However, we have seen the growth of a mass market for audio
books on casette and CD over the last decade. It is estimated that a
decade from now, text to speech technology will be virtually
indistinguishable from real human readers. At that point the vast world
of digital publishing has the potential to open up to a readership
comensurate with its potential. Digital books or etexts will not emerge
from an archivist and hobbyist niche until they are transformed into
audio books, when electronic text to speech readers become better and
simpler than they are today. The first steps on that road will be taken
later this year when Microsoft adds support for text to speech to its
Pocket PC 2002 operating system. It is more likely than not that the big
commercial publishers will hold out long enough with their ebook line to
connect with this potential audience, eight or ten years from now, in
which case the copy protected model will win a place for itself in the
digital world, and etexts of all kinds will have a chance to
dramatically increase their circulation. In the big picture is it
premature to predict the death of this format.
Leslie Evans
Los Angeles