Re: Why proofed and formatted digital text?
- From: Bowerbird@[redacted]
- Subject: Re: Why proofed and formatted digital text?
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:33:16 EST
bill said:
> I think I reject the dilemma Jon is posing here.
good thinking!
in the near future, machines will do almost _all_ the work
of morphing "raw o.c.r. text" to a state of near-perfection
in regard to both proofing and formatting, so this whole
line of questioning will fade to total meaninglessness...
noring is trying to use the spectre of "unproofed o.c.r." as
a trojan horse to smuggle his demands for heavy markup.
(the future will also prove that heavy markup has high costs
which do not return benefits sufficient for the investment...)
-bowerbird
p.s. no project i know of has said "the scans are enough".
all of them are doing o.c.r. otherwise, they couldn't _search_,
and users would look at them like they were absolutely crazy.
which is why this whole issue is a no-brainer from the start...